Home     Updates     Hydros     Cars     Engines     Contacts     Links     ←Previous                        Contact On The Wire

John Goodall

Building and racing retro tethered cars

Harry Howlett inspired Oliver

The Oliver cars were all designed by Harry Howlett and all drawings from the factory acknowledge this. Although the production cars are best described as semi-scale, Harry had his own version of each to which he added huge amounts of detail, louvres, exhausts, mirrors, windscreens, cockpit detail and more. As John Goodall describes below, he has applied a similar treatment to a standard version of the Oliver Mercedes.

This is the  Mercedes/Redfin twin shaft I purchased at Buckminster, which I have been doing some work on as shown. I decided to add front suspension and some detail and thought others might be interested in how I approached this. I obtained a Mercedes pin badge off ebay for the Mercedes motif on the nose, one cost £1.50 and the other £2.99 I think, including postage.  You could not make them for that and the finish is good too? The 0.04” diameter wire was straightened with pliers and then threaded 14BA which is just about the correct start size. I shall make a nut to secure it in position after painting. The front suspension is again 0.032” spring steel with riveted on stub axles as was described for the ZN car. These were left longer than on the ZN car so that the slots already cut in the top half were utilised to support the axle from road shocks. The spring steel was cut using a Dremel cutting disc and drilled using Cobalt drills as described for the ZN.

The grill was made from SS mesh I had in stock and I made a male former to slightly less in size than the aperture shape with which to bend the mesh over, but quickly found that the curvature was not maintained due to spring back. I then made a female block gouged out using a chisel to match the concave curvature and this helped greatly in maintaining the shape. The two parts are clamped in the vice which effectively forms the curvature on the mesh and then the edges are carefully turned over with light hammer blows leaving a broader strip at the base so it can be fixed to the body as shown. I pierced the holes using a scriber to start and increased the size with an awl. I thought drilling might be awkward and possibly dangerous, as the edges are very sharp and can cut fingers?

The detail added included dummy windscreen, rear view mirrors and an exhaust pipe and I shall finish paint in Mercedes Silver stove enamel with red or black Vinyl racing numbers. These numerals are available on ebay fairly cheaply and come with multiples of each type of number on one sheet.  Great care is needed if applying these stickers dry as once positioned and in contact with the surface they will not come off, or move. Wetting the surface with a slightly detergent solution to give some slideability is advised by some vinyl users. This can be squeegeed out using a credit card, or similar plastic padding applicator. I have used these on vintage motorcycle tanks and when clear lacquered on top are far better and more durable than transfers which can lift, especially in the presence of petrol.


The Birth of the Oliver 'Tiger'

In 1949 the Oliver's were invited to Sweden as part of the British team for the return leg of the Anglo Swedish match races. Aware of the speed of Gerry Buck's Elfin powered car, the Olivers built an entirely new twinshaft engine in just three days that was a radical departure from their previous sideport Nine Port and Jaguar motors. It was quickly installed in 'Busy, seen here before being taken to Sweden by JSO. Such was the immediate success of the engine that orders piled in, so creating the legend that was the Oliver Tiger. Production versions of the engine differed considerably and the original vanished long ago so here, John Goodall describes the building of a replica of this iconic motor.

During the last few cold spell months I have been trying to find machining work to do, as my main workshop has no heating and I have some background storage heating where my machinery is installed in an insulated area, so keeping the chill off for a more pleasant environment. I thought I would have a further attempt at the prototype Oliver engine which eventually became the Tiger MK1. My first attempt with a front rotary valve was based on the Rustler Tiger Mk1 aero engine, so that I could use the aero engine crank shaft and cylinder assembly, I decided to use this replica Tiger as the start point for a more accurate prototype replica. It should be borne in mind the original prototype engine was built in a great rush, in about one week only and short cuts may have been taken purely to get a result in the time available. Is this why it did not survive I wonder, simply serving the purpose and then being scrapped? To me it was a priceless piece of history?                                                       Right: The start point

Discussing this with Hugh Blowers, certain characteristics were seen as most likely, the most obvious being a disc valve induction system because the first few engines were of this configuration. The next was a very narrow angle to the venturi intake of 30 degrees from the crank shaft alignment which Hugh thought it should be from photographic evidence. Later production engines were set at 45 degrees, so I compromised at 35 degrees!

I think now Hugh may well have been correct, because if you look at some of the early photographs of Busy which set the then new British Record at Orebro in Sweden in 1949, the needle is situated outside of the rear body. This however places the jet well outside the centre of the fuel tank as well and not desirable for fuel feed reasons in my opinion.

Left: Pattern for disc valve taken from the only original DV motor known to exist

The other very obvious design feature was the mounting system using "U" bolts and axle support blocks featured in the earlier engines and here I later had a problem when mounting the engine in the next "Busy" body. The 35 degree angle I had chosen for the venturi restricted moving the support block sufficiently inboard to clear the body side. At the later 45 degrees it would have been easier. So I ended up having to machine a step in the block on the venturi side to overhang the chassis. I also had to file away the block to clear the venturi body. I think the Oliver's must have had an even worse installation problem here as well and may explain why production engines eliminated some of these expediencies, with the improved foot mounting and the venturi set at 45 degrees.

I commenced by stripping the Tiger Mk1 aero engine replica and making sketches of the crank case dimensions needed and cut a block from HT alloy to suit the main case and slave housing which was to be screwed into the main case body. I made the slave shaft housing first so that I could use the male fixing thread to gauge the female thread in the main crank case body later.

All fairly straightforward turning with phosphor bronze bushes made and pressed in for the main shaft bearing surfaces. I did extend the bearing to cover the face of the disc valve seating to give an improved seal hopefully? Alan Knight kindly agreed to make the crank shafts for me at this stage provided I left some material in the bores for him to finish to the fit needed later.

                                                                               Right: Comparison of cases

The main body was set up on a four jaw chuck with packing pieces to avoid damage to the clamped surfaces. I machined the crank case bore and main bearing bores in one operation to maintain alignment. Then screw cut the thread for the slave shaft housing which I made it imperial as it would have been in 1949.  I next mounted the case at exactly at 90 degrees to machine the cylinder fixing bore and retaining internal screw thread, which had to be screw cut to match the cylinder fixing thread which is metric on this Rustler replica. It turned out to a very good fit. I used to enjoy screw cutting during my apprenticeship now well over seventy years ago, blimey that long?? The outside body taper was now also machined, scaled off the aero engine and slightly increased for additional strength.

The outside nose area of the main housing was now machined using an expanding sacrificial mandrel which you can buy very cheaply from model machine tool suppliers like Chronos and the best way of attaining concentric accuracy. The outside diameter is turned after mounting in the three jaw chuck, to the exact size of the main body bore. The body is then mounted on this this to give the accuracy and the mandrel socket screw tightened to grip the body for machining the outside. This can now be turned and will be concentric to the bore. I again made a phosphor bronze bush for the main bearing surface leaving approx. leaving  0.005" for later finishing.

I now turned attention to the venturi and decided the NV position needed to be as close inboard as possible for fuel feed reasons. The fixing thread was governed by the maximum size I could accommodate in the housing and was 0.250" OD x 32 TPI with a bore of just 0.190". I was not convinced I could increase this overmuch to increase performance at the expense of minimum wall thickness?

I next screwed the slave housing into the main body as tight as I could get it without incurring damage and marked for the venturi position in line with the cylinder axis but 180 degrees from the aero engine. I also had to think how it would be tightened for final assembly and decided to machine two flats to take a suitable spanner. 

                                                                                                     Right: Trial assembly

The intake housing was next machined setting the case at 35 degrees on an angle plate on my milling machine to machine the venturi fixing and intake port to a theoretical depth? This proved tricky and time consuming as it had to be correct. The main difficulty is it has to be machined to meet up from two different directions with the connecting port machined from the flat inner face at the appropriate radial distance to the theoretical point in the housing. The junction had to be filed using riffler needle files to gain a smooth transition. This proved very tedious and time consuming overall with the equipment I have and I now know why the Oliver's soon changed to a Rotary Valve on later production engines, as they would have had similar equipment to mine with consequent time penalties. A luxury you cannot afford in commercial production.

I posted the basic engine off to Alan at this point and started on making the main drive wheels.  I wanted these to look more like those on the original Busy than my previous replicas. However the only tyres I had in stock which might be near enough were rather narrow resulting in even narrower wheels and this left insufficient room to sink the retaining nuts into a counterbore, as the originals had been made, so my retaining nuts ended up rather exposed, but "end on" look the same.

I decided front suspension is needed on all cars I build to run in the UK because of the track surfaces and I used a simpler variation of that on my previous Busy builds. It comprises a channel machined in brass to give a bearing for the pivot pins, with alloy "Z" shaped axles spring loaded off the channel bottom inner face in locating counterbores. These were milled and turned in the four jaw chuck. The pivot pins are retained with a grub screw in the axle.

A steel pin is pressed into the lever end to prevent the spring sliding off. Springs can always be adjusted after trail runs, whereas rubber in compression as on my Vanwall is more difficult? I again made the wheels with little tyre rubber exposed to keep to the original lean look as closely as possible. The screws were fitted from the inside because of greater material depth on the outside.                      

                                                                                              Right: View of rear drive fixing

After getting the engine back with its new crank shafts fitted and nicely free to turn I made the brass spacers seen on the disc valve ex Gerry buck engine. I used this engine for the disc valve design incidentally assuming it would be very similar.  The spacers restrict end float and make sure that the disc valve has a reasonable seal. They are currently set up with minimal end float and may have to be adjusted if the engine tightens when it gets hot?

So there it is, having taken much longer than the original to make, even with the donor cylinder assembly, but as close as I can reasonably get to it, I cannot wait to run it now? The next Busy replica car is finished and being painted at the stove enamellers I use in Burton upon Trent, Dumelos who are very good for all stoving and powder coating work.

Left: Completed engine, tank, wheels and front suspension

The finished replica of Busy with the replica prototype Tiger twinshaft

Oliver Tiger twinshaft variants.

Prototype with Disc valve motor Prototype, DV. RV. RVB. Rotary Valve. Rotary Valve Ball Raced.

The photographs above show the evolution of the Oliver twinshaft that culminated in the much more common Tiger twinshaft MKII. The prototype fitted in Busy has never been seen again, next is the Disc Valve motor of which only around three were built, then the newer Rotary Valve version and finally the ball raced rotary valve motor. Serial numbers are prefixed DV, RV RVB respectively.

©copyrightJohnGoodall2021